Five case notes
Assignment type : Other types
Format MLA
Volume of 900 – 1500 pages (5 pages)
Description
There are five case study
In the case notes, you should answer the questions at the end of the relevant case study to be discussed in class, in a brief note form, to be submitted
There will be eight cases in total as listed below. Students should submit case notes
Week 1: Film Prioritisation (p. 62-65)
Week 2: ORION Systems (A) (p. 100-103)
Week 3: Advantage Energy Technology Data Center Migration (p. 206-7)
Week 4: Alaska Fly Fishing Expedition (p. 242-3)
Week 6: Moss and McAdams Accounting Firm (p. 98-100)
Week 7: Franklin Electronics (available on vUWS)
Week 8: Maximum Megahertz (p. 540)
Week 9: AMEX, Hungary (p. 566-8)
All five case notes must show a satisfactory analysis of the case, including calculations if appropriate, sufficient to prepare the student for a class discussion of the issues in the case. Case notes may be useful during the open book exam.
You should nominate one case note from your five submissions for assessment in week 9.
Marking criteria and standards
Students are expected to answer the questions at the end of the case study. Each submission must be relevant to the case with satisfactory answers for the questions at the end of the case study in order to receive 1% mark for submission. It should not be a re-writing of the case.
The nominated case note in week 9 out of five submissions will be marked between 0 – 5% using the following marking criteria:
0-2.5%
Incomplete and/or wrong interpretation of the case data. No calculations if required. Little or no understanding of the topic or a mere description of the case. Missing/incorrect answers for the questions at the end of the case study.
2.6%-3.25% Mostly correct and complete answers for the questions at the end of the case study. Mostly correct calculations if required. Sound understanding of the topic. Reasonable ability to critically consider the project management topic focused in the relevant week.
3.26%-5% Clear logical analysis of the case data and correct answers for the questions at the end of the case study. Correct calculations if required. Sound understanding of the topic. Sound ability to critically consider the project management topic focused in the relevant week.
[wpadm-chat]
Sample Feedback from students
AMAZING WORK! This writer did not do any plagiarism and did what I asked exactly for the APA format! I will definitely use this writer again for another paper! Thank you so much for you service ! AMAZING Job!
Excellent work. this is my fourth order and its an excellent paper. All the requirements and instructions I provide were well addressed. Excellent Writer. Topic: The Effects of Herbs and Spices on Blood Pressure – A Systematic Review
The is the best writer I have ever had All details were followed accurately, and the completed work delivered way before deadline. The quality is very good. I will place another order with you soon. Warm regards.
I’m impressed, I must say. Seldom do I come across a blog that’s both equally educative and engaging, and let me tell you, you’ve hit the nail on the head. The problem is an issue that not enough men and women are speaking intelligently about. I’m very happy I found this during my hunt for something.
Good work but could have been more attention to detail. I did a quick edit afterwards and found some minor punctuation errors. Other than that it was all fine.
I checked the completed copy for "Dismantled, ornament based culture in 20th Century Vienna" . Its amazing Very well written! I am always pleased With the services you Offer.
This is an excellent writer She gave me the assignment many hours before the deadline. It would take only a couple minute for her to respond to my questions and concerns. I had a great experience.
Wow this writer did it perfect again Has written multiple papers for me and I have gotten all straight A’s! When you choose this writer you choose best quality work!
Thank you for the service. You provide High quality articles and research papers. I give you 5 star rating.
